 |
|
History of Bangla
The ancient, medieval, and colonial history of Bangladesh covers a period
from antiquity to 1947, when India was partitioned. So the history of
Bangladesh prior to 1947 is a history of India of which Bangladesh was a part.
In fact, the history of India is a history of Bengal for the large part. Today
Bangladesh is an independent nation within the Indian subcontinent, but is
less than half of the old Bengal or Bangla.
Prehistory: Introduction
The modern state of Bangladesh officially came into existence through a
people's liberation war in 1971. Bangladesh is the eastern part of Bangla.
Bangladesh (East Bangla) and West Bangla (India) are the same nation and
together they once formed the major part of Bangla (Banga or Gaur). There were
some other parts of Bangla though that are no longer within East or West
Bangla. Bangla was divided into East and West parts by the British, first in
1905, but it proved unpopular and was reversed in 1911. Later during the
partition of India, rich Muslim landlords in the East supported the division.
So again since 1947, Bangla is divided into at least two parts. Bangla was
ultimately ruined by this division and today there are even those who have
been culturally so much derooted that they feel that the people of the other
Bangla are foreigners! That is one of the greatest achievement of British
imperialism. Bangla was one of the most important centres of India and now it
is a ruined nation no longer a potential threat to the west. Its long and
great history is forgotten by the world and also many Bangalees today. Even
though Bangladesh is a modern state, her history can be traced back to about
1000 BC. There are many theories about the origin of the name Banga or Bangla.
Some linguists believe that the name originates from the Tibetan word, "Bans"
which means wet or moist and Banga (Bengal) is a wet country crisscrossed by a
thousand rivers and washed by monsoons and floods from the Himalayas. Some
others believe that the name originated from the Bodo (original Asamese in
North Eastern India) "Bang La" which means wide plains. This theory is
extremely plausible. Another school suggests the name comes from the name of
Prince Banga. According to legend, Prince Banga, the son of King Bali and
Queen Sudeshna of the Lunar dynasty was the first to colonise Bangla. What is
probably the real root is from the name of the original people of Bangla. This
also is taken from legend. One of the tribes who according to a claim emerged
from the Indus Civilization after its demise had entered the plains of Bengal
while others went elsewhere. They were called the Bong tribe and spoke
Dravidian. We know from many ancient Aryan texts of a tribe called Banga that
existed in that region.
Archeology
Geology and archaeology tell us that Bangla was formed 1 to 6.5 million years
ago and the first known human habitation goes back to 100, 000 years in the
past. Paleolithic tools and implements from a hundred thousand years ago have
been found in Deolpota in West Bangla and 15, 000 year old implements have
been found in South East Bangladesh. New Stone Age civilisation, showing
connection with that of Bihar, Orissa and Asam existed in Bangla around 3000
to 1500 BC.
Then suddenly a metal processing civilization appears. Archaeology has not
been able to find the missing link from stone tools to metal tools use. This
might suggest the influx of a new people into the region and maybe this goes
hand in hand with the legends. The Indus civilization ended around 1800 BCE
and there is a marked change in Bangla around this time...this ties in with
the story of the Bong and Al peoples. Recently an ancient city has been
discovered in West Bangla at Chandraketugarh near Berachampa, in North 24
Pargana. The city is presumed to be of King Chandraketu from the Gupta era
(4th to 6th century AD) but will await carbon 14 tests. Statues of Goddess
Yakshi have been discovered here. At Berachampa is another location of
interest. Here the'khana-mihir's dhibi was found, a site with Gupta temples.
In Jessore, Bangladesh (East Bangla), the Bharat Bhanya site has been
tentatively assigned to the Gupta period as well. (Md. Shafiqul Alam, Deccan
College, Pune 411 006)
We can assume cities existed in ancient Bangla, however, not many ruins dating
back in or before the first millennium BC have been located. Certainly some
cities like Pundra are refered to in ancient Aryan texts before there was much
contact between the Aryans and the Bangales. Were the ruins such as
ChandraketuGarh (Gaur) built upon older cities of the past?
In the ancient Aryan texts, Purs were mentioned describing forts or cities of
the Drabirs of the Indus civilization. The interesting thing is names of
places in the Indus region often end with -Pur and likewise in Bangla, place
names commonly end in -Pur.
A Lost History
Many assume that South India and Bengal were backwaters because of the lack
of interest of the Aryan scriptures in them. They were not backwaters but
simply they were non-Aryans. Since Bangla and South India were not Aryan, they
are not highlighted in the history of the Aryans or North India. However,
since there were powerful kingdoms and cities in Bangla that were in close
proximity to the Aryans, Bangla is mentioned somewhat. Also because of
Buddha's travellings, there are some more references. (Note: the earliest
references are mostly disdainful. If anyone travelled to the Drabir land, then
their would be pennances and ritual sacrifices). Dance forms seem to have
originated in Drabir India. South Indians have given us several unique dance
forms and Gaur of Bangla has also given us unique dance forms. From the ruins
of ancient Indus civilization we find dancing girl figurines which indicate
the origin of the dances of India.
Even the ancient texts, however, whether intentionally or not, reveal the
greatness of Bangla. In Bhishma-parban, the Bangalee kings heroically face
attacks from the Pandus or conquerors of Upper India. There is a description
of the encounters between the Pandus and the mighty ruler of the Bangas. While
some of the Bangalee kings fought on elephants, others rode on ocean-bred
steeds of the hue of the moon. What were these ocean bred steeds of the hue of
the moon? Were they ships? In the very ancient times, Pundra, Gaur (Gaud or
Garh), Rarh (Radha, Ladha), Sumha, Bajra (Brahma), Tamralipti, Samatata, Banga
and Anga comprised Bangla. At one time Gaur was the name used for the Bangla
region but the name Banga later became popular. This might reflect the
prominence of the regions in a period whose history is lost. Banga is first
mentioned in the Aiterya Aranyaka, a Hindu scripture. The book mentions Banga
as a non-Aryan (Drabir) nation. In the Aitareya Brahma, the people of Pundra
tribe (along with Andhra, Shabara, Mulinda and Mutiba tribes) is called dasyu,
clearly non-Aryan or Drabir.
Bangla is also mentioned in the Mahabharat, one of the four great epics. In
the great war of Kurukshetra described in the Mahabharat, a Bangalee king
fought for the Kaurabs (Kaurabs are supposed to be the villains. They are most
probably Aryans and so this might show the beginings of Aryan-Drabir alliance
makings.). In another instance, King Basudeb of Gaur (old name for Bangla)
fought with Krishna in Dwarka, a port city in Gujarat on the western part of
India. The Mahabharat also mentions three Bangalee princes who try for the
hand of princess Draupadi. In this epic, some Bangalees are mentioned as
untouchables. These were the coastal tribes of Bangla who were called
Mlechchha. All the tribes in Bangla (and Kalinga, a South East Indian empire
and even Magadh and Anga (Bangla) were considered non-Aryan. Banga and Kalinga
were Drabir even in Mahabir's time and Aryanization only began with Ashok when
part of it was under the Mauryan empire. As Aryanization penetrated into Manu
classified Bangla (Pundra), Shaka and Drabira as fallen Kshatryias (Kshatriyas
were the warior or ruling caste). This was an attempt to incorporate them into
the Aryan caste system. Towards Arjun's time, Mahabharat and the Bayu and
Matsyapuranas also call Bangalees (Pundra and Banga, Sumhas) Kshatriyas. And
later the Jaina Pragyapana calls Bangaless (Banga and Rarh) Aryans signifying
the beginning of absorption. It was probably then that the caste system became
rigid and oppressive to maintain segregation.
"The Culture of India is pre-Aryan in origin. As in
Greece, the conquered countries civilized the conquerors. The Aryan Indian
owed his civilization and his degeneration to the Dravidians as the
Aryan Greek to the Mycaeneans." -- Hall: Ancient History of the Near
East
It was only during the Gupta rule around the 4th century period that
Aryanization fully penetrates Bangla. The caste structure is instilled and
Brahmans (highest caste) are mentioned. Batsyan in his Kamsutra (the bible of
sex) mentions Brahmans in Bengal. Vatsayana talks about handsome Bangalees who
painted their nails to attract girls. Ancient Bangalee men painted their nails
to attract girls. This is the earliest mention of coloring nails. In the
ancient Indus, girls used lipstick which is also another first use.
Ancient Hindu Center
Many think that the concepts of karma and transmigration of the soul, the
practice of yoga, the worship of Shib, Debi and Bisnu, and other rituals that
are not Vedic came from the Aryans. However, these are now believed to have
existed in Bangla before Aryanization. This is also supported by the fact that
today at least Yoga and Shiva are associated with the Indus civilization which
existed before the coming of the Aryans. The cultivation of rice and other
crops such as the betel leaf, coconut, tamarind and nut, the Hindu dress of
dhuti, marriage rituals with vermilion and turmeric, and many other customs
come from pre-Aryan ancestors.
Age of Glory
Bangla history in the 1st millennium BC was that of glory and expansion. This
period is connected not to North India but to South India and the Eastern
Asia. Its expansion was a maritime expansion. Bengal was an ancient seafaring
nation, possibly a continuation of the seafaring of the Indus days. As early
as 544 BC, Bangalee prince, Bijay Singha of Bangla established the first
kingdom in Sri Lanka. The ancient name of Sri Lanka, Singhal comes from the
name of Bijay Singha. The Sri Bijaya empire of Indonesia that dominated East
Asia for over a millennium bears Sri Bijaya's name, possibly meaning that it
was founded by him. This empire is known to have been a strong indian centre
as early as 135 AD by the Chinese, which means that Indians (Bangalees) were
there earlier in history, possibly the 6th/5th century BC, if Sri Bijaya
founded the empire. From here the region of cambodia to Vietnam was dominated
by the ancient Bangalees. Madras was another kingdom established by the
Bangalees. These show that Bangla was a well organized land even in antiquity.
This period of expansion is unmatched in later history. An intersting point to
note: the Madras people are Tamil (Dramila) were the original Bagnalees same
as Tamils?
Early History
In India, the ancient kingdoms were called Mahajanapadas. There were
several of them all over Northern India. Anga, Ashmak, Avanti, Chedi, Gandhar,
Kashi, Kosala, Magadha ( in Bihar and later annexed part of Bangla and
adjoining areas when it started expansion), Matsya, Shursen and Batsa (today:
Kasuambi in Bihar, King of Batsa, Udayana was Buddha's follower) were the
major kingdoms. Some Mahajanapadas like Banga, Kamboj, Koliya, Kuru, Lichhavi,
Moriya, Panchal, Shakya (Buddha's family ruled here), and Brijji were
republican states. The republican states were not ruled by kings but had
assemblies of senior and responsible elders called 'Gana-parishad'. (This is
still visible in villages in India.) The Magadha, Kosala, Batsya (Bihar), and
Avanti (Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh) were the most notable kingdoms of ancient
India.
Anga: Anga was an ancient kingdom. The people were originally Drabir but were
absorbed early in the Aryanization process. They had become part of Magadha in
the 6th century BC. Anga was part of Bangla but now mostly lies in Bihar,
including her capital, Monghyr.
Ashmak:
Avanti: A kingdom near Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh. He warred with Magadh,
Kosala, and Batsa. Eventually Magadha emerged victor.
Gandhar: Present day Afganistan. Afganistan was part of India until the 10th
century when it was overrun by foreign invaders.
Kashi: Today Kashi remains as the famous holy city Banarasi or Banaras.
Kosala: Of all the small kingdoms in North India, the history of Magadha and
Kosala are documented well, because of Buddha and Mahabir's presence there.
There are references to Bangla, since Buddha had travelled there to preach.
Kosala was an empire roughly the size of Britain and is also the birth place
of Raam, the Hindu Avatar. It existed in Central North India, with capital at
Ayoddhya. Shrabasti, Kushabati and Saket were its other famous cities.
Archeological excavations have shown the remains of a great empire there,
which existed sometime between the end of the Harappan civilization and the
emergence of historical empires in India whose tales might be recorded in the
Mahabharat and Ramayan. The legendary Tirthankaras of Jain are also from here.
Kosala was ruled by Prasenajit during the time of Buddha, around the 6th
century BC.
Magadh: Neighbouring Magadh (an ancient Drabir nation) started getting
powerful in the 7th century BC. It started out as a sixth of the size of
Kosala in the extreme south east of Bihar. Its old capital was at Rajgriha (Rajgir)
in present day Bihar. In the 6th century BC, it was definitely a major power
under King Bimbisara. (It must be noted that Bimbisara had married Prasenajits'
sister.) Part of the rise in Magadh's power was due to its king Bimbisara's
bold new strategy. Until then in Magadh the armies were loyal to the different
tribes but Bimbisara changed this making the armies loyal to himself. Magadh
is the first kingdom recorded in Indian history that attempted to create a
great empire. There is evidence that Buddha himself had counseled the King
Bimbisara of Magadha as how to subjugate and annex the neighboring Lichabi
republic (D.P. Singhal pg. 57). Later Bimbisara became the first patron of
Buddhism. Buddha had highly influenced Bimbisara. The capital of Magadh also
became Buddha's homebase. There were thousands of Magadhans who had converted
to buddhism by then. It must be noted that Prasenajit later converted too,
leading to massive success of early Buddhism. By the time Magadha started to
expand, there was probably a high degree of Aryan penetration into Magadh, as
evidenced by the fact that Buddha spoke Maghdi Sanskrit, which is an Aryan
language. Magadha was probably one of the first Aryo-Drabir synthesis centres.
Both the Buddhist and Jain religion (which in antiquity originates in Kosala)
developed here. In its early stage it anexed the smaller kingdoms of Kashi,
Madra and Anga (Bangla). And also lost in antiquity, Prasenjit carried out a
long protracted war with Magadh. Eventually Prasenajit was deposed by his son
and Kosala was overwhelmed by Magadh. Thus Magadh now stretched all across
Northern India becoming the first historical empire of North India. King
Ajarsatru, son of Bimbisara started the task of building the empire in 490 BC
and Magadh was extended under great Nanda kings as far west as Punjab. The
Nanda kings had set up an effective ministrative system that was necessary to
run their large empire. The huge four-fold army of two hundred thousand
infantry, twenty thousand cavalry, two thousand chariots and three thousand
elephants. They introduced the stem of standard weights and measures (if this
is the one used in modern India then it is remarkable that it was base 16 like
ancient Indus). The Nanda Kings were patrons of art and literature. By the
time Alexander conquers northern India in 326 BC, Magadh was a great empire
under the Nandas and this was the seed from which the Mauryan empire
germinated, retaining the great bureaucracy, army and passion for arts and
literature of the Nanda kings.
Earliest Western References
Gangariday (Bangalee) king had 4 thousand war trained elephants. The
periods just before the Mauryan empire and after it is almost nonexistent in
India. However, some history can be collected from Greek sources. The first
western reference comes from Alexander's invasion of India. Alexander had
conquered much of the "known world" and had defeated the western kingdoms of
India. They were stopped at the Magadh empire. The Greek historians suggest
that Alexander retreated fearing valiant attacks of the mighty Gangariday and
Prasioi empires which were located in the Bangla region. Alexander's
historians refer to Gangariday as a people who lived in the lower Ganges and
its tributaries. These empires attest the level of organization of the peoples
of Bangla region. These names are again mentioned by Diodorus. He describes
Gangariday as a nation beyond the Ganges, whose king had 4 thousand war
trained and equipped elephants. Later Periplus and Ptolemy also indicate that
Bangla was organized into a powerful kingdom at the onset of the first
millennium AD. When Greek historian Periplus talks about India in the first
century AD, apparently he speaks of Bangla. He says,
"There is a river near it called the Ganges (Ganga)" ...On
its bank is a market town which has the same name as the river, Ganges (Ganga).
Through this place are brought malabathrum and Gangetic spikenard and pearls
and muslins of the finest sorts, which are called Gangetic. It is said that
there are gold mines near these places, and there is a gold coin which is
called caltis. And just opposite this river there is an island in the ocean,
the last part of the inhabited world towards the east, under the rising sun
itself, it is called Chryse; and it has the best tortoise-shell of all the
places on the Erythrean Sea" (Sudheer's India's Contribution to the World's
Culture). ... But the waves utterly overwhelmed it, and Chryse sank and
disappeared in the depths..." --( Pausanias, Description of Greece
8.33.4)
It is apparent that these empires existed before the Mauryan empire and
continued after the fall of that empire. Some believe Bangla was part of the
Mauryan Empire. However, it seems that these two kingdoms continued to exist
even after the Mauryan empire. Part of Bangla, namely Anga and Pundra were
probably under the Mauryan empire but the rest of Bangla remained outside the
Mauryan empire. It is possible that these two empires entered into alliance
with the Magadhans prior to the formation of the Mauryan empire thus retaining
independence. Or simply the Bangla empires might have been too powerful (note
they had more war elephants than the Mauryans which might indicate their
power).
Muslin Fabric
The ancient western reference to the Muslin shows that the legendary
fabric is not a new export of Bangla but ancient. It must take its rightful
place with cotton and silk fabrics that go back in time in Bangla. The British
colonialists deliberately destroyed the Muslin production (to market the
Britsh cotton in India) by brutally chopping the Muslin weavers' thumps off.)
The Muslin was legendary because a 50 meter long Muslin fabric could be
squeezed into a matchbox. Today's Muslin is a different fabric altogether. The
technology is lost.
".......As to young ladies damping down their muslin
gowns to make them cling was probably not an English affectation, more than it
might have been a French fad, and during 1795-1810 than the English Regency
that was 1810-1820. Fashion plates of the period, especially from Heideloff's
"Gallery of Fashion" and "Ackermann's" show English ladies more "bundled up"
than their French counterparts. There were some fantastic extremes of fashion
during the French Directorie period, but the influenza outbreaks during
1795-1805 probably had
more to do with cold wet winters and shortages of food, especially during
wartime than what ladies wore--men died of influenza too and doctors couldn't
blame it on them wearing muslin gowns, cashmere shawls and sandals even in the
coldest weather. Besides, only a very few could afford gowns and shawls of
such expensive materials, especially as muslin couldn't stand up to hard wear
and the needed frequent washing to keep it clean and white......."
Cindy Abel
Health Sciences Library, USA
Alexander's Indian Adventure
In 518 BC, King Darius of Persia had conquered North West India including
parts of Punjab. The Indian kings of this region were subordinate kings of
Persia. The Persians coined the term Hindu to describe the people of India. It
was a mispronunciation of Sindhu, the large river of western India, now in
Pakistan.
When Alexander defeated Persia (around 320s BC), and came to India, he met the
subordinate states of Persia. These states were nonetheless powerful.
Alexander wanted to go to the famed city of Taksha Shila (Taxila, North India)
across the Sindhu River (Indus). On his way there, he defeated the Ashwakas,
who attacked him, in a fierce battle. By the time he attacks Purus (another
Western Indian kingdom), he needs the alliance of two other kingdoms of India.
Ambhi, King of Taksh Shila made alliance with Alexander (was this alliance
made before Alexander entered India?). Another king Shashi Gupta also entered
into alliance. They were enemies of Purus. It took the three kings to finally
defeat Purus, in a very hard battle. As he proceeded eastwards, he was daunted
by greater tasks and his army had lost its morale, forcing him to turn back.
As mentioned earlier, he probably did not want to meet with the organized
armies of the independent Indian empires of Magadh, Gangariday and Prasoi.
At the end of his adventure, Alexander had conquered the states of Kekaya, Gandhara
and Punjab in Northwest India. During the subsequent centuries, Indo-Greek
trade picked up. Along with trade of goods, ideas were exchanged. Indian
astrology was influenced by the Greeks. The Indians adopted the 12 Zodiac
signs. Indian philosophy and science also permeated into Greek culture at the
same time.
Age of Empires: Mauryan Empire
The Mauryan Empire owes its name to Mura, mother of Chandra Gupta. Mura was a
lower caste woman and Chandra Gupta was the illegitimate son of her and the
Magadhan king. According to legend, the Nanda King, Dhananda, who ruled during
the time of Alexander's invasion had an illegitimate son by a Shudra (lower
caste) woman called Mura. When Alexander came to India, Chandra Gupta had met
him as a young man and through him, Alexander probably learned of
the organized armies of the East. Two years after Alexander departed, Chandra
Gupta started a war against his father. He was aided in this by his Guru and
foster father, Bishnu Gupta, who is popularly called Kautilya or Chanakya.
Kautilya is the writer of the Artha Shastra, the first great political
treatise of the world. In 322 BC, Chandra Gupta became the Emperor of Magadh
and Bishnu Gupta became his able Prime Minister. Chandra Gupta extended his
empire as far west as the Indus (Sindhu) river in modern day Pakistan,
recovering much of India that was lost to foreign invasions of the Persians
and the Greeks. In 305 BC, the Greeks, under Alexander's general Selucas (then
king of Babylon), returned and met Chandra Gupta in battle. This time they did
not face a provincial king of Western India but an emperor from Eastern India.
Selucas was defeated. Chandra Gupta, however, was very generous with the
defeated general, and only took parts of Selucas' land as compensation and
even gave 500 elephants as a gift. He also married Selucas' daughter thereby
creating an alliance. The nature of the alliance is not known but given the
nature of ancient India's political overlord ship, Selucas probably ruled an
independent kingdom under the Mauryan empire. From Megasthenes, a Greek
ambassador at Chandra Gupta's court, we learn that this new empire was
extremely oranised, much like modern states of today. Chandra Gupta's capital,
Pataliputra (now known as Patna, in Bihar, India) was the greatest city. It
was certainly the largest city as well. In this empire even certain central
villages were fortified. The first great highway of history was built that
still exists today as the Grand Trunk Road. The road was flanked by trees and
milestones. One of the first great secret services was also born here under
the guidance of Kautlya. People from all rank and file were included in the
service. Even the emperors of this empire would go out in disguise to see the
needs of the city.
Towards the end of his life, Chandra Gupta had abdicated his throne in favor
of his son and had gone to Belgola, Mysore with a Jain sage. The Jain sage had
predicted drought and famine correctly. At Belgola, he fasted till death,
entreating the Gods to end the drought.
His son, Bindusara, ruled in relative peace from the Hindu Kush to Mysore.
Kalinga (present day Orissa) was outside his rule though. At this time India
had peaceful relations with the Syrians and the Greeks. Then came, in 276 BC,
the great Ashok son of Bindusara who litterally conquered all India. He was
probably the greatest king to have ever ruled in this world. Not the size of
his empire but the noble ideals of this man made him great. Pillars
proclaiming him as a just and wise ruler exist all over India. In Gandhar (Afganistan)
and other western areas, the inscriptions are in Greek as opposed to Brahmi
that was the script of India. These show that the Greek rulers in the
northwest were his subordinates. Ahsok had become a Buddhist and was a very
peaceloving just king who was also the first ecologically concerned king. He
set up the first animal preserves in the world.
However, he started out as a hungry conqueror. On the ninth year as emperor he
attacked Kalinga (Orissa), one of the last Drabir nations on the North East,
other than Bangla. (NOTE: Anga, Banga, Kalinga are classified together
possibly due to their common heritage.) The battle that ensued was one of the
most memorable and toughest of ancient India. Ashok won but was deeply
affected by the carnage. Ashok was aghast at his own doing. He only found
relief in Buddhism and thus marked the making of a new Ashok, a man of peace.
He dedicated the rest of his life to public welfare. He sent missionaries to
spread Buddhism to Greece, Egypt and Sri Lanka. Ashoka died as the first
people's emperor in 272 BC, who believed love to be superior to war.
The Mauryan empire was the greatest of all Indian empires. The greatest extent
of the empire under emperor Ashok stretched as far north as Tashkent, in
modern day Uzbekistan, including Afganistan and covered part of Iran and
Tajikistan to Myanmar in the East. Remnants of this are still visible. It can
be observed in the Indian names still existing from east Asia to central Asia.
Tashkent is the corruption Taksha Khand and Quandahar is the corruption of
Gandhaar. It is important to note here that originally Afganistan (Upa-Gana-Stan)
was an integral part of India. There are other Indian names even further west.
Pundra Bardhan (West Bangla) and Anga (Bangla) were part of the Mauryan empire
but it is however, not sure if all of Bangla was in the Mauryan empire. As
mentioned earlier, it might be that the other Banglas retained their
independence. Bangla port Tamralipti introduced the landlubber Mauryan
emperors' to seafaring. Ashok's descendants, for various reasons, which
include pacifism, saw the decline of the empire. Finally the Mauryan empire
ended violently in 185 BC. In 185 BC, an army commander in chief, Pushya Mitra,
assasinated the last Mauryan emperor during a parade of his troops. Some
suggest this was a reaction of Brahmins against the highly Buddhist rulers.
Chaos
Pushya Mitra returned many of Brahmins to power. He also allowed the killing
and sacrificing of animals. It was a return to strict Hindu religion. Pushya
Mitra was not, however, to enjoy his rule long in peace. Within two years of
the fall of the Mauryan emperors, once again came the invasion of foreigners.
The King of Bactria, Demetrius, who was probably subordinate under the
Mauryans, invaded and conquered the North West Indus region. Further
encroachment was stopped by Pushya Mitra in a series of Indo-Greek wars.
Pushya Mitra ruled for 36 years and was not a bad ruler. His reign saw the
mark of intellectual fermentation. Patanjali, the great grammarian lived in
this period. Art and literature also further developed. PushyaMitra never
assumed the title of emperors but founded the Sunga dynasty. During Sunga
reign the Mauryan empire reverted to the old Magadhan empire and the Sungas
were ardent patrons of the Hindu. They persecuted Buddhists and destroyed many
Buddhist stupas. However, they were not totally intolerant of Buddhism shown
by the facts that the Buddhist stupa at Sanchi was enlarged and the great
stupa at Bharhut was erected during the Sunga period. The Sunga rulers caused
the empire to break up into different kingdoms with their in-fighting.
The last Sunga king, Deba Bhumi, was killed by his minister, Basu Deb in about
75 BC. The Kanva dynasty ruled after that for a short period till 30 BC, when
they were overthrown by the Andras (originally Drabir). This marks the
beginning of a period of chaos that was to last for three hundred years.
During this period, the Indo-Greek Buddhist Kings set up independent states in
the northwest. Soon they were replaced by Central Asian tribes of Shakas
(Scythians?) and Pahalavas. These people promptly got absorbed into Indian
culture. The Kushanas followed also from Central Asia. They established a
great Buddhist empire in the west stretching from Kabul to Banaras. They too
had become Indianized while adding to Indian culture significantly. This
empire spread Mahayana Buddhism all over the world. The empire existed even in
the 2nd century AD.
Around 200 BC, the Satabahanas emerged from Maharastra. They ruled Maharastra,
Madhya Pradesh and even regions of South India. Gautamiputra
Satakarni of the Satabahanas defeated the Shakas and his empire stretched from
Kathewad, Malwa and Rajasthan in the north to the river Krishna in the south
and from the Arabian Sea in the west to the Bay of Bangla in the East.
It should be noted that towards the end of the Mauryan Empire, Kalinga had
once again become powerful and had thrown off the Mauryan rulers. Kalinga
became extremely powerful under Kharabela and conquered the Southern India,
whose history is not known very well. He even defeated Agni Mitra, son of
Pushya Mitra and had sacked the capital of Magadha.
Guptas
Bangla history in this period between the Mauryan rule and Gupta rule (the
next great empire) is not known clearly. However, we know from the Greek
sources, mentioned above, that the Gangaridai and the Prasoi empires continued
to exist in this period. They probably retained independence through the
Mauryan Empire. This is also the period when Bangla became Buddhist. By the
time the Guptas enter Bangla, it is predominantly a Buddhist nation. Before
the Guptas, Bangla history probably became more connected with Eastern Asia
more than India (except probably Kalinga). During this period it appears that
the Bangalees spilled into Burma, Thailand and all the way to Vietnam. The
Mons of Thailand and Burma were dominated by Bangla / Kalingas. Their history
also was probably more connected to Indonesia whose ancient script is very
similar to Proto-Bangla. And maybe they kept connection with Sri Lanka.
North India remained divided and the west was once again under foreign rule
until the rise of the Guptas. In the south, however, powerful empires rose to
prominence. Chera (Kerala), another ancient sea-faring nation of South West
coast of India, who might also be descended from the Indus civilization, at
this time traded with the Romans as they had with the Greeks and the Jews and
Egyptians earlier. Out of the chaos in North India, rose a new Chandra Gupta
in 320 AD. He married the Lichabi princess, Kumara Debi. Kumara Debi was the
heiress to the throne thus bringing Chandra Gupta to power. The Lichabi
republic once annexed by Magadh now annexed Magadh and created a new empire
under the Gupta dynasty. Once again Magadha became the centre of the empire.
Under Samudra Gupta, son of Chandra Gupta, the empire was further extended. He
recovered the Western India and extended his rule to the South of India as far
as Sri Lanka. The south was not conquered but subordinated by treaties. The
Gupta era is called the Golden Age of India. India became the leader of all
spheres of life in this period. Some of the greatest architecture and art
comes from the Guptas. The most powerful of the Southern empires were Bakataka
empire (250 - 500 AD). The Gupta's never conquered them and ended up making a
treaty.
In the early phase of Gupta expansion, they defeated Bangla and annexed her.
Two Barmans kings of Bangla are defeated. This is the first mention of the
Barmans. As Bangla came under their rule, Tamralipti again served as a major
port. Once again under the Guptas, India became a great nation, in strength,
culture, spirituality and science. The first wave of Hun invasions were
defeated by the Guptas so convincingly that they decided to give up their
plans to invade India for decades, turning their attention to the Roman
empire, devastating her. Were these Barmans the emperors of the Gangaridai and
Prasoi empires? The Barmans as will be seen are very active throughout Indian
history. They come from Drabir lines as in Bangla, and South India. Were the
Barmans big players in the ancient Indus civilization?
Post Gupta North India
The Guptas came to an end around the 5th century AD after being weakened by
the Huns and the Kanauj ruler Yasho Dharma. This was a very chaotic period in
all India as well as Bangla. Rapid changes took place in lordship across all
India. Different subordinate states around the Gupta empire started declaring
independence. .."Indian cities are prosperous and
stretch far and wide. There are many guest houses for travelers. There are
hospitals providing free medical service for the poor. The bihars and temples
are majestic.
People are free to choose their occupations. There are no restrictions on the
movement of the people. Government officials and soldiers are paid their
salaries regularly. People are not addicted to drinks. They shun violence. The
administration provided by the Gupta rulers is fair and just." ...Chinese
traveler Fa Hien, during the reign of Chandragupta II.
Sources:
A Short History Of Bengal by Tanmoy Bhattacharya
A History of the Indian People by D. P. Singhal
Courtesy: Muktadhara
|
|
|
