A Response to Jahed on Reagan's Legacy

 

Bonna Ahmed 

 

WRT : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/message/17560 

 

Jahed 

You raised a very good point that tons of people are paying tribute to Ronald Reagan including ex-British Prime minister Margaret Thacher. If how many people supported or paid tribute decide the nobility of a leader or action then, following the same logic, we should also justify Hitler�s actions as  noble deeds or invasion to Iraq as a blessing to humanity, as majority of the people of those invading countries supported the actions. It is ok to pay tributes but we should not try to justify all wrong doings of a person only because he died recently. It is very easy to be misled by the popular media, I would ask you to read or listen to other liberal medias (if possible international medias) before you make a judgment call on Reagan�s legacy. As Alain said there is nothing wrong in calling a spade a spade, there is no need to make a person look like a noble man only because he died couple of days ago.

Reagan redefined conservatism in United States politics. If you claim yourself a liberal then you might want to do some more research on his domestic and foreign policies on different issues. He drew on the ideas of a group called the �neoconservatives,� The conservative face of Republican party we are experiencing today was strengthened by Reagan�s strategy. He was against abortion rights and advocated for prayer in schools.  Reagan was responsible for attacking women's rights, as he tried to legitimate the backlash against feminism. He appointed the far right justice Antonin Scalia to the Supreme Court, and he loaded the lower court benches with anti-choice ideologues (Matthew Rothschild, published in Progressive). Please read through the list below and if you still think these were all actions with good intentions I will have no more to say�. I have tried to refrain myself from giving any opinion, just copied and pasted different postings and quotes from different newspapers with facts�.

Reagan on Foreign Policy:

 Lebanon (collected from AP US History News)

Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to destroy guerilla bases, and the next year, Reagan sent U.S. forces as part of an international peace-keeping force, but when a suicide bomber crashed a bomb-filled truck into U.S. army barracks on October 23, 1983, killing over 200 marines, Reagan had to withdraw troops, though he miraculously suffered no political damage. (APUS History News)

South Africa (Published Wed, June 9,2004, by Boston Globe, by Derrick Z. Jackson)

PRESIDENT Bush proclaimed: "Ronald Reagan believed that God takes the side of justice and that America has a special calling to oppose tyranny and defend freedom." In the first three days of news reports on the death of the former president, not a single major American newspaper, television station, or politician has dared to exhume this counterpoint to the Reagan's legacy: "Immoral, evil, and totally un-Christian."

These were the words of Bishop Desmond Tutu, spoken on Capitol Hill at a House hearing in late 1984. It was just after Reagan's easy reelection. Tutu had just been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his nonviolent struggle against apartheid in South Africa. Throughout the United States a rising number of Americans were calling for American companies to stop doing business there.

Reagan ignored them. The president of so-called sunny optimism attempted to blind Americans with his policy of "constructive engagement" with the white minority regime in Pretoria. All constructive engagement did was give the white minority more time to mow down the black majority in the streets and keep dreamers of democracy, such as Nelson Mandela, behind bars.

In the weeks leading up to his appearance on Capitol Hill, Tutu said in speeches that it seemed that the Reagan White House saw "blacks as expendable" in South Africa. The white government forced black people from prized lands and into horrid townships. Migratory labor laws split families for 11 months at a time. Education was gutted for black children. There was virtually no due process for black defendants. Tutu said it was "reminiscent of Hitler's Aryan madness." Tutu declared that "constructive engagement is an abomination, an unmitigated disaster." Over the remainder of his presidency, at least 3,000 people would die, mostly at the hands of the South African police and military. Another 20,000, including 6,000 children, according to one estimate by a human rights group, would be arrested under "state of emergency" decrees. Yet Reagan had the gall to say in 1985 that the "reformist administration" of South Africa had "eliminated the segregation that we once had in our own country." In 1986, Reagan gave a speech where he said Mandela should be released but denounced sanctions with crocodile tears, claiming that they would hurt black workers, who were already ridiculously impoverished. Reagan's go-slow speech was denounced by Tutu, who said: "I found it quite nauseating. I think the West, for my part, can go to hell. . . . Your president is the pits as far as blacks are concerned. He sits there like the great, big white chief of old."

Later in 1986, Reagan made his greatest demonstration yet that black bodies were "expendable." Congress had finally had enough of the carnage to vote for limited sanctions. Reagan vetoed them. Congress overrode the veto. Reagan proceeded to put no muscle behind the sanctions. Mandela remained in jail and at least 2,000 political prisoners remained detained without trial.

In 1987 Reagan published a report that said additional sanctions "would not be helpful." The gleeful South African foreign minister, Roelof Botha, said that Reagan "and his administration have an understanding of the reality of South Africa." 

Iran Contra Scandal

Ronald Reagan did not blink at fighting communism in Grenada and in Central America. But funding of anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua would lead to the worst scandal of his administration. The secret and rogue operation, under the direction of the National Security Council's Oliver North, used the proceeds from weapon sales to Iran to fund the anti-communist Contras in Nicaragua -- despite a congressional ban on such funding.

The president's closest aides maintain that Reagan did not fully know, and only reluctantly came to accept, the circumstances in what became known as the Iran-Contra affair.  (CNN)

I also came across this interesting piece in http://www.inthe80s.com/scandal.shtml, while I was searching on this Iran-Contra scandal�.

    • Jan. 17 -- Reagan signs a finding authorizing CIA participation in the sales and ordering the process kept secret from Congress.
    • April -- Then-White House aide Oliver North writes a memo outlining plans to use $12 million in profits from Iran arms sales for Contra aid.
    • Nov. 5 -- Bush records in his diary "On the news at this time is the question of the hostages ... I'm one of the few people that know fully the details ... it is not a subject we can talk about ...."
    • Nov 13 -- Bush's diary: "I remember Watergate. I remember the way things oozed out. It is important to be level, to be honest, to be direct. We are not saying anything."
    • Nov. 25 -- Attorney General Edwin Meese III discloses to the public that $10 million to $30 million in arms-sale profits were diverted to the Contras. Bush's diary: "The administration in disarray -- foreign policy in disarray -- cover-up -- who knew what when?..."

 

Policies on Other countries: (Published on Wednesday, June 9, 2004 by the Progressive by Matthew Rothschild  )

Reagan was responsible for killing tens of thousands of innocent people in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Honduras as he waged illegal wars and funded brutal militaries. The truth commission of El Salvador investigated the murders of 75,000 people during the civil war in the 1980s, and it found that the Salvadoran military, or death squads connected to the military, had committed the bulk of those crimes. At the time, Bush was lavishing hundreds of millions of dollars on the Salvadoran government, and his CIA was working with the death squads.

Reagan was responsible, as Christopher Hitchens has noted, for approving Israel's invasion of Lebanon, which killed about 18,000 civilians.

Reagan was responsible for his own unilateral invasion of that huge threat to the United States called Grenada. (Oh, the great liberator!)

As Joanna Kirkpatrick has mentioned in response to Jahed�s post Reagan has supported all dictators not only because they supported US policy. She wrote, �During the Reaganocracy, he supported dictators around the world, including first of all Saddam, but also Marcos of the Philippines, Duvalier of Haiti,and worst of all Mobutu of Zaire. Because of Reagans knee-jerk cold warpolicies the US sent billions to Mobutu just because he kept on saying he
favored us against the USSR. Mobutu did nothing for his country�he impoverished it, acting like a god on earth, while he sent the billions to Swiss banks or spent them on his lavish life-style�

Social issues (Published on �On the Issues�)

The president was so cut off from the counsel of black Americans that he sometimes did not even realize when he was offending them. One example occurred when Reagan sided with Bob Jones University in a lawsuit to obtain federal tax exemptions that had been denied by the IRS. The IRS denied tax exemptions to segregated private schools. Many of them were schools such as Bob Jones University, which enrolled a handful of minority students but prohibited interracial dating and marriage. It was the basis of this discrimination that the IRS denied the tax exemption. Reagan would later say that the case had never been presented to him as a civil rights issue. More astonishingly, he did not even know that many Christian schools practiced segregation

Reagan never supported the use of federal power to provide blacks with civil rights. He opposed the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965. Reagan said in 1980 that the Voting Rights Act had been �humiliating to the South.� While he made political points with white southerners on this issue, he was sensitive to any suggestion that his stands on civil rights issues were politically or racially motivated, and he typically reacted to such criticisms as attacks on his personal integrity

Reagan proposed constitutional amendment to allow prayers at school. He said in his speech in Orlando Florida, Mar, 8, 1983, �When our Founding Fathers passed the First Amendment, they never intended to construct a wall between government and religious belief. The Supreme Court opens its proceedings with a religious invocation. Congress opens sessions with a prayer. I believe the schoolchildren of the United States are entitled to the same privileges. I sent the Congress a constitutional amendment to restore prayer to public schools. I am calling on the Congress to act speedily and to let our children pray.�

 

Budget  and social Welfare issues:

 For over two decades, the government budget had slowly and steadily risen, much to the disturbance of the tax-paying public, and by the 80s, the public was tired of the New Deal and the Great Society and ready to slash bills, just as Reagan proposed. Reagan�s budget cost $695 million, and the vast majority of budget cuts fell upon social programs, not on defense, but there were also sweeping tax cuts of 25% over three years.  

During the 1980s, income gaps widened between the rich and poor for the first time in the 20th century (this was mirrored by the emergence of �yuppies�), and it was massive military spending (a $100 billion annual deficit in 1982 and nearly $200 million annual deficits in the later years) that upped the American dollar (as well as the trade deficit, which reached a record $152 billion in 1987) and made America the world�s biggest borrowers. Supply-side economics claimed that cutting taxes would actually increase government revenue, but instead, during his eight years in office, Reagan accumulated a $2 trillion debt�more than all his presidential predecessors combined. (Collected from AP US history notes)

 During the same period, the average family income of the poorest fifth of the American population dropped by 6.1 percent, and rose 11.1 percent for the top fifth, according to "Sleepwalking Through History," the best-selling assessment of the Reagan years by Haynes Johnson. The number of people living beneath the federal poverty line rose from 24.5 million in 1978 to 32.5 million in 1988. And the number of homeless people went from something so little it wasn't even written about widely in the late 1970s to more than 2 million when Reagan left office. (Published on Thursday, June 10, 2004 by the San Francisco Chronicle by Kavin Fagan)

 

[Mukto-mona] [Articles] [Recent Debate] [Special Event ] [Moderators] [Forum]