Shouldn�t the CEC Resign ? (Part 2)
Published on June 04, 2006
Continued from Part-1 ...
Analysis of the fake voter list, prepared by EC
Before we analyse the doctored voter list prepared by Justice MA Aziz and his team, let us have some figures of the last few years of total population of the country and corresponding voters� list on the basis of which previous elections were held.
As we stated above the number of voters in the draft list = 91,314,000
Male voters: 46,864,302
Female: 44,450,290
Population in the year 2001(according to the census report) = 129,200,000
Number of voters in the last general election (2001): 7 4,660,443
Percentage of voters of the total population (2001): 57.78 (~58)
On the basis of the above figures the last most eventful election of 2001 was held.
Table 1 showing population & corresponding voters
Year
Total population
Number of voters
Increase of voters from previous election
Percentage of voters of the population, K(%)
1970 (16th June)
61,479,000
29,479,386
-
47.9 (~ 48)
On the basis of these figures, election was held in which AL overwhelmingly got majority both in the National assembly as well in the Provincially assembly.
1971
62,893,017 (estimated)
The year of our liberation war; on December 16, the Pakistan army surrendered uncondionally.
1973 (updated in 30th June)
65,819,366
(estimated)
35,205,642
5,726,256 (in 3 years)
53.5 (~ 53)
On the basis of the above voter list, the first general election in independent Bangladesh.
1974
71,478,000
First Census was held.
1976 (updated in 7th December)
38,789,239
3,583,597 (in 3 years)
-
1979
On the basis of the above voter list, a general election was held.
1981
87,120,000
Second Census was held.
1983 (updated in 5th August)
91,920,000
(estimated)
47,876,983
9,087,744 (in 7 years)
52.09 (~52)
1986
On the basis of the above voter list, a general election was held.
1988 (updated on 3rd March)
101,455,159
(estimated)
49,863,829
1,986,846 (in 5 years)
49.15 (~49)
1990 (updated on 15th February)
104,766,000
52,081,793
2,217,964 (in 2 years)
49.71 (~ 50)
1991
107,993,000 1
On the basis of the figures of 1990, a general election was held in which BNP won marginally and formed government with Jamat support.
1. In 1991 another census was held after 10 years since 1981. In another source total population was given as 106,315,000, which is slightly different from quoted above in the row. I had no time to cross check. It is apprehended that list was not done updated carefully by the then EC in 1990.
1995 (updated on 7th August)
118,305,9822 (or 115,993,000. see foot note below)
55,966,384
3,884,581
47.31 to 48.25(~47 - 48)
2. On what rate of increase of population this estimation was made, I don�t know. My calculation on the basis 10 years (1991-2001) population the rate is found to be (r = 0.0165) projected population in 1995 would be 115,298,893
19963 (see foot note)
117,201,325 (projected)
56,149,182
182,798
47.90 (~48)
3. The infamous election was held on the basis of above figures on 15th February without any participation of major political parties. BNP government was forced to swallow and incorporate the system of caretaker government in the constitution, and it resigned following a mass upsurge.
19964 (see foot note)
56,702,822
553,640
4. A fresh election took place under the first constitutional caretaker government on the basis of the above updated voter list. AL emerged victorious.
2000 (updated on 30th April)
60,141,876
3,439,000 (in 4 years)
2001(30th June) 5
129,200,000 6
7 4,660,443
14,518,567 (in only one year)7
57.78 (~58)
5. The most controversial election was held on the basis of this voter list, made up to date on 30th June, in which the BNP and its alliance unexpectedly won the election with more than two-third majority seats in the parliament. The AL, which was overwhelmingly defeated getting only 58 seats called the election a finely conceived �election engineering� designed and executed by a group pro-BNP bureaucrats with the cooperation of the then chief of the caretaker government, the then CEC, and even the president (the AL alleged). The number of voters in 2001 election is most unreliable and probably full of fake voters cleverly enlisted by the EC, perhaps under the guidance of the then CEC, as within a span of 10 months it jumped from 60.14 millions to 74.66 millions with the rise of 14.5 millions voters at the rate of 24.14 % (in ten months). The rate of rise per year is then R ~ 29 % a fantastic figure. For this reason corresponding K value (~ 58 %) in the last column of the last row cannot be accepted as normal. One should avoid the figure for any calculation. The K factor hovers between a small range from 53 to 48 with average value 49.72 (~ 50).
6 In this year a census was also held after 10 years. In another source the total population was shown as 123,851,000 which is somewhat different from quoted above in the row. I had no time to cross check.
7. In only one year, this large increase of voters seems to be strange. There must be something wrong, may be the then CEC also had some hand in it. This has also been reflected in the percentage increase � only in 2001 update the total voters constitute ~ 58 % of the total population. A look into the last column of the table reveals that this figure from 1970 to 1996 hovers around 47 to maximum 53 %; only in 2001 it shot up to 58 %.
This is to be noted that since 1970, there were major updating of voter lists as many as seven times in the years 1973,1976,1983,1988,1990,1995 and 2000. Another reshuffle of voter list was done by the EC supervised by CEC Sadek in 2001 on the basis of which the last general election was held. Although on the basis of these updated voter lists including the voter list of 2001, elections were held no serious complains ever heard either from the wining parties or from the defeated parties. Only in recent times late president Zia�s son Tareq, assistant secretary (grade 1) of BNP and some Jamati leaders remarked that voter list of 2001 contained more than 6500,000 (sixty five lakhs) fake voters. See foot note 5 above. But this time the Aziazian voter list has crossed even the limit of 2001 for which it has been turned down by the general public, all opposition political parties and the representatives of the civil society. We will come to this point later on.
The increase pattern of number of voters over different periods
We further note that rate of increase of voters in different period of time is as follows (see table 2).
Table2 showing rate of increase of voters (R%) over different periods
Period
Increase of Voters over the period (n)
Rate of increase of voters/per year (%), R%
Population (P2)
Population (P1)
Difference
1970-1973 (3 years)
35,205,642
29,479,386
5,726,256
6.47
1973-1983 (10 years)
47,876,983
35,205,642
12,670,341
3.6
1983-1995 (12 years)
55,966,384
47,876,983
80,89,401
1.41
1995 �2000 (5 years)
60,141,876
55,966,384
4,175,492
1.49
1995-2001 (6 years)
7 4,660,443
55,966,384
18,694,059
6.38
1973-2001 (28 years)1
7 4,660,443
35,205,642
39,454,801
4.00
1970-2001 (31 years)2
7 4,660,443
29,479,386
45,181,057
4.94
1. During the Bangladesh period from 1973 to 2001, the last census year, the over all increase of voters per year per 100 in the period of 28 years is 4 %.
2. From 1970 � 2001 over a span of 31 years the rate of increase of voters is ~ 5 %
The increase of voters from 1970 to 1973 i.e. in three years 19.42 % (R ~ 6.5 %) is simply a fantastic figure, and in no way could be tenable. This means the number of voters recorded in the year 1973 is rather faulty. Again the voters from 60,141,876 in 2000 increased to 74,669,443 in 2001 i.e. in less than one year the increase of voters is 14,518,567 (R ~ 24 %) is simply unimaginable. The number of voters shown in 2001 seemed to be very inflated and is therefore unreliable. Any estimation on the basis of voters in 2001 would be foolish. Only reliable figures are in the last column with R values 3.6, 1.41, 1.49 during the periods (1973-1983), (1983-1995), (1995 �2000) respectively although I have serious reservation accepting the number of voters as 35.2 millions in the year 1973 and hence I doubt the reliability of R vale as 3.6. So any calculation on the basis of voters recorded in 1973 and 2001 would be erroneous and give fantastic result as has been reflected in the table.
The rate of increase of voters with R ~ 1.4 -1.49 % seems to be quite reliable and tallies more or less with trend of rate of increase of population (R ~ 1.65 � 1.52 %).
Before we proceed further let us have a glance over the population growth rate of Bangladesh as reflected in different census reports. We again put it in tabular form.
Table2 showing growth rate of population (R%) over different periods
Census years
Increase of population
(in thousands)
Rate of growth
(per year in %)
R %
Year (Y1)
Year (Y2)
Period (years)
Population (P1)
Population (P2)
Difference (P2 � P1)
1951
1961
10
41,933
50,840
8,907
2.14 (1.94) +
1961
1974
13
50,840
71,478
20,638
3.122 (2.62)
1974
1981
07
71,478
87,120
15,642
3.126 (2.83)
1981
1991
10
87,120
106,315*
19,195
2.203 (1.99 )
1991
2001
10
106,315
123,851
17,536
1.649 (1.527 )
1961
1970
09
50,840
61,4791
10,639
2.32 (2.11 )
1970
1974
04
61,479
71,478
9,999
4.07 (3.77 )
The above table shows that, if the census were carried on faithfully, the growth rate reaches highest peak during the period 1961 � 1981 (20 years) R ~ 3 %. It is also seen that R assumes a maximum value of 4 % in the smaller period of 4 years (1970-1974) following the liberation war. The sudden growth rate is rather unexplainable whose cause may lie in the socio economical conditions obtaining in post independent Bangladesh. Question may be raised- was the census carried out faithfully and utmost reliability? The figure R then showed significant decline arriving to a minimum value R ~ 1.65 � 1.53 % over the period 1991 � 2001. We may accept this growth rate as current one that may be applied in estimating population in future time over a small time period.
What should be the population in 2006
On the basis of our recent trend of growth rate (R ~ 1.65 - 1.53 %), population in the year 2006 may be estimated as lying between 140,216,598 to 139,185,000. On the other hand according to government�s own economic review report of 2005 reveals that the current population growth rate is R ~ 1.48 %. On the basis of those data we present the projected population in 2006 in the following table.
Table3 Projected population in the year 2006
Growth rate, R%
Population in 2001 (last census year) (in thousand)
Projected Population in 2006 (in thousand)
1.65 �1.53 (present calculation)
129,200
140,216 � 139,185
1.48 (Government economic survey 2005)
129,200
139,048
According to Report of the family planning ministry, the population in 2006 (July) is 135,000,000 i.e. 135 millions which is not far from our projected population of 2006.
In any case population in the current year cannot exceed 140 millions.
Projected voters in the year 2006.
Last column of The table 1 gives the value of what percentage of total population becomes voters over different periods. The factor K ranges from 48 % to maximum value ~ 58 %. It is noted that only in the year 2001, the K value assumes ~ 58 %, otherwise the value lies in the range of 48 to 53. We have already put forward arguments to reject the number 58%. The average value of K over the years from 1970 to 2000 is 49.7 which may be accepted as ~ 50 %. On this basis, the number of voters assuming the current population being 140 millions could be in the range of 70,108,000 to 69,693,000. If we use the growth rate of population as 1.48, number of will be still less. So we may say that the projected voters in 2006 should not exceed 71 millions.
On the other hand if we accept 1.5 % as the rate of growth of voters during the period 1995-2000, the projected voters is found to be 65,761,720 i.e. around 66 millions. This is quite comparable with the above figures given above.
Our CEC and his team managed to increase the voters to a fantastic figure of 91,314,000, a little over 91 millions. Even if we take the number of projected voters in 2006 as 71 millions, then one may genuinely ask where did the excess of voters to the tune 21 millions come from ? Surely the EC and its chief executive justice Aziz owes an explanation. If we assume that Azizian figure of 91m is right then one has to presume that since the last census the number of new adult voters (18 years or above) would be above 31 millions from 2000 to 2006, if we assume no significant immigrants settled in Bangladesh over the period in question. Hence rate of increase of adult population (A) turns out to be 8.6 %, a figure one cannot rely on. On the other hand Table 2 shows that normal adult population growth may be around A ~1.5 %.
What should be the population of Bangladesh according CEC figure ?
One may genuinely ask if the Azizian figure of voters (91m) is assumed valid then what should be the population of Bangladesh in the current year ? Let us try to answer the question. As we have said earlier from the anlaysis of trend of voters-population ratio, we see that voters in a particular year seems to be K ~ 50 % of the total population. And only in the year 2001 the ratio has risen to ~ 58 % which we have rejected as unreliable.
If we assume K factor as 50%, then the total population should be182.63 millions (!) in the year 2001.Even if we assume K factor as high as 58 %, the population shots upto157.41 millions. In such case what would be the growth rate of population from 2001, the year of last census? If the population of 2006 is as large as 182.63 millions as CEC Aziz wants us to accept, the growth rate turns out to be R = 8.27%. Do we have to believe it ? If the population is assumed 157.41 millions, R value is 4.37%, still a very large value compared to present accepted value by the demographers (R ~ 1.65 to 1.48). See table 3. The following little table gives the estimated growth rate as K factor varies from varies from 50 - 60 % on the basis of Azizian magic figure of 91.3 millions.
Table 4 Shows the projected population in the year at different values of K-factor
Azizian magic figure M = 91.3m
K-factor (%)
Population in 2001 (millions)
Projected population according to M and K
Growth rate estimated (%)
50
129.2
182.63
8.27
55
�
166
5.68
58
�
157.41
4.37
60
�
152.2
3.53
All values of R in the last column are unbelievably large. Should we make further comments on the draft voter list prepared by CEC and his team including those two pro BNP election commissioners. I would only say that after what the HC directives said, and the fake voters list, prepared by the Election Commission, made public the CEC and the two members of the EC have forfeited the right to sit in the election commission any more.
Picture: A recent Bichitra Cartoon (whatever you say sir, we want voters for our alliance)
In our next part we will try to see how the fake voter list was manipulated and the consequence of Supreme Court verdict on the issue.
(End of part 2)
To be continued
+ The figures within bracket has been calculated using an exponential relation also used in demographic analysis.
* In another source it is quoted as 107,993,000. I could not cross check
1 This figure was found from 1970 election proceedings.
Prof. Ajoy K. Roy, is a reputed scientist and human rights activist from Bangladesh.