Is the State still in a state of denial? Mozammel H. Khan

Is the State still in a state of denial?

Mozammel H. Khan

Published on February 13, 2007

The worst did not happen, but could have happened. The perpetrators of the last Wednesdayï¿½s country wide bomb attacks were some what kind for the fact that they did not use yet the deadliest weapons as available in the arsenals of their international comrades. If they had, there would have been a national catastrophe of astronomical magnitude. The precision at which half a thousand or so bombs were detonated in every district town of the country except one, with the utmost accuracy in a time span of only thirty minutes, not only underscored their superb technical know-how but reflected their disciplined and synchronized net work as well. Next time around, God forbid, people of the country may not be so fortunate.

The act of unprecedented terrorism that was inflicted on the nation on Wednesday might have caught the highly politicised, just like any other organs of the State, intelligence agency of the country by surprise, but not the concerned citizens, many local media and to some extent the international media analysts those who bothered to write about the impending danger of the rising Islamic militancy in Bangladesh. But the current government since the publication of an article, ï¿½Bangladesh: A Cocoon of Terrorï¿½ in the Far Eastern Economic Review is constantly in a state of denial. The Economists in its 16th June issue commented, ï¿½the government makes it hard for foreign journalists to visit. When they do, it tends not to like what they write, especially recent suggestions that Bangladesh is witnessing a rise in Islamic extremism, and becoming a haven for international terrorists.ï¿½ In direct contrast to the situations prevailing under the current government vis-ï¿½-vis those of its predecessor, the Economist wrote, ï¿½Rich-country diplomats say that whereas, three years ago, their main focus was on economic development, it is now on defending democracy.ï¿½

If there is one thing consistent about our government, it is to be in a state of denial. This is why, all the stories about the rising Islamic militancy, including the New York Times Magazineï¿½s unflattering story "The Next Islamic Revolution?" has provoked the similar words of denial from the government so much so, that it completely refused to acknowledge even a shred of authenticity in any of the reports. Any one subscribing to the views of the international media were dubbed as ï¿½unpatrioticï¿½ and have been accused of undermining the ï¿½imageï¿½ of the country. The media analysts were labelled Indian, Jewish or American agents, who were all out there to ï¿½tarnish the imageï¿½ of the country. In tune with the borrowed phrase of the government from an erstwhile US ambassador that ï¿½Bangladesh is a moderate Muslim countyï¿½, some of our expatriate compatriots, who enjoy their lives in free and democratic societies, in joy and in grief, wrote pieces dismissing the vivid stories of activities of the Islamic militants and potential threat they possess to our traditional free society. Their envision of patriotism excludes the cognizance of the forces who are identified as potential threat to our free system and thought. These one-eyed patriots fail to comprehend the fact that militancy and extremism do not engulf the nation in pursuance of the free will of the people.

One after another, when the secular institutions or personalities were targeted, the government not only accused the opposition secular political parties for committing the crimes, but also took their leaders into custody and inflicted inhuman torture on them. But so far none of them has ever been indicted for any of the crimes and all of the crimes, till date, including the carnage of August 21 remain unsolved. Right after the current very well-orchestrated bomb attacks, the government leaders took no time, in their traditional practice, to blame the opposition AL for the heinous acts. Starting from the senior ministers to the leaders of the youth wing of the BNP, they have not only blamed, ï¿½those who try to tarnish the country's image have committed the heinous crimeï¿½, a phrase commonly reserved for AL, but some youth leaders went as far demanding to take some AL leaders including the leader of the opposition and former PM to remand, a common practice initiated by the current government to treat the opposition politicians. BNPï¿½s partner, the Jamati Islami, was not as ambiguous about the allegation since its Secretary General was very explicit and squarely blamed the AL, which, in his words, ï¿½conducted the unprecedented blasts as part of a blue print to make the country politically unstable.ï¿½ Without contesting the seemingly ridiculous logic behind the allegations, it would be suffice to comment that if AL had such organized power to carry out these massive and disciplined operations, there would have been martyrs on both sides, not in the AL camp only, over last four years of the alliance rule.

One might argue that the opposition leaders are similarly blaming the government for the bomb attacks. However, one has to take cognizance of the fact it is the government, which has all the machinery under its control to prove that the opposition is wrong, it is not the other way around. Opposition has no power to take any one on remand or to interrogate any one to investigate the accusations and counter accusations. Since both sides are accusing each other for the crime, an opposition suggestion to invite a neutral body such as FBI to carry out the investigations carries logical merits. This practice is followed in many countries including Canada, in spite of the fact that it has a very well powered de-politicized agency by the name RCMP to carry any criminal investigation. This would be possible only if the government abandons its policy of embracing any foe of AL as its friend. Some members of the parliament and ministers of the ruling alliance belonging to the northern area where Banglabhai and his comrades are trying to re-establish their reign of terror flatly denied, even after the country wide attacks, the existence of the thug leader, albeit the so-called Banglabhai has been featured in a number of stories relating to Bangladesh in the international media including the recent one in The Economist. Even their own government has been doing mock attempt to arrest the person who was nonexistent in its radar before his organization was banned. Some political analysts who are in cohort with the government in its state of denial spared no time on casting doubt on the ability of the Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), who claimed the responsibility through leaflets, to carry out such massive and well-orchestrated attacks, as if they are well aware of the nitty-gritty of this organization. In fact, the credibility of the government leaders and their cohorts has never been in such low ebbs. The more vociferous the denial of the government, the greater the chance that the denied story might just be true. It seems that only way one could find out if something has gone wrong when the government leaders issue denials that anything has gone wrong anywhere.

The dress rehearsal of the impending danger should force the government to withdraw itself from the state of denial. The danger is no more hypothetical and if, though already very late, not taken seriously would destroy the foundation of the free society that bulk of our citizens so much cherish. The lion share of the onus to protect our value systems and democracy rests with the government, which, in the first place, needs to pull itself out of the state of denial and protect it with the help of the people, acknowledging the fact that the opposition political parties are an integral part of the process. The stakes could not be higher: the nation and the freedom of its people and the BNP and its current allies have not been given the exclusive right to them. Dr. Mozammel H. Khan is the Convenor of the Canadian Committee for Human Rights and Democracy in Bangladesh

Dr. Mozammel H. Khan is the Convenor of the Canadian Committee for Human Rights and Democracy in Bangladesh. He writes from Toronto, Canada.